The Grenfell Tower Inquiry has revealed unsettling truths about product manufacturers involved in the 2015 refurbishment.
- Arconic, Celotex, and Kingspan have released statements following accusations of dishonesty and manipulation.
- Arconic insists it provided legal, safe aluminium composite material and denies misleading actions.
- Celotex acknowledges the inquiry’s significance, pledging improvements in safety and transparency.
- Kingspan addresses past failings and commits to leading in building safety solutions.
The Grenfell Tower Inquiry has shed light on the actions of key manufacturers engaged in the refurbishment of the ill-fated high-rise. Allegations of “systematic dishonesty” and “deliberate manipulation” have been directed at Arconic, Celotex, and Kingspan, painting a grim picture of industry practices leading up to the tragedy.
Arconic has taken a firm stance against the claims, stating that its subsidiary, Arconic Architectural Products SAS, supplied aluminium composite material legally and safely used not only in the UK but also in over thirty other countries. According to the firm, all safety reports were publicly available, and Arconic did not mislead any certification body or client.
Meanwhile, Celotex has expressed its dedication to digesting the inquiry’s findings thoroughly. Acknowledging the extensive and complex nature of the investigation, Celotex has embarked on a journey of internal reflection and change since the fire. The company has scrutinised its RS5000 product testing and marketing practices, sharing newfound insights with relevant parties to prevent future tragedies. Post-inquiry, Celotex has improved internal controls and remains cooperative with ongoing investigations, reiterating its commitment to high-rise building safety.
Kingspan, addressing the publication of the inquiry report, has expressed deep condolences to the fire’s victims and acknowledged historical inadequacies within its UK operations. The company’s statement highlights the inquiry’s revelation that the type of insulation was less significant than the combustible PE ACM cladding in the fire’s spread—a cladding not produced by Kingspan. Despite the findings, Kingspan has reinforced its dedication to superior compliance and safety standards, asserting its role in advancing sustainable, safe building practices.
The Grenfell Tower Inquiry has initiated overdue reflections and commitments from key manufacturers, emphasising a collective move towards greater accountability in the construction industry.
