The handling of Progressive Safe System (PSS) permit applications by Transport for London (TfL) has faced criticism for inefficiencies.
- Chris Cooling from Day Aggregates highlights errors in TfL’s processing, leading to accepted permits being initially rejected.
- Concerns arise over inconsistencies in the criteria applied to different vehicle manufacturers’ applications.
- Despite widespread issues, Logistics UK notes that the number of affected businesses is minimal.
- TfL acknowledges teething problems and commits to resolving application issues.
The Progressive Safe System (PSS) permit application process managed by Transport for London (TfL) has recently been labelled a ‘farce’ by Chris Cooling, a leading manager at Day Aggregates. Cooling detailed a recurring problem where applications were rejected by error, only for some to be accepted upon resubmission without alteration. Despite manufacturer assurances that should have guaranteed acceptance, particularly for vehicles complying with the EU’s General Safety Regulation 2 (GSR2), aspects of applications for certain trucks were inexplicably denied.
One striking inconsistency noted was the differential treatment of applications for Volvo and DAF trucks. Though both brands included identical safety compliance affirmations, only the Volvos saw approval, leaving applications for brand new DAFs rejected. Cooling voiced confusion, arguing that the same safety features were deemed acceptable in other vehicles yet faced scrutiny at TfL.
Moreover, Cooling described a broader backlog issue, citing that a significant number of their submissions were initially dismissed or met with vague explanations, particularly about compliance with PSS essentials like the Moving Off Information System or Blind Spot Information System, which are, incidentally, covered under GSR2. Despite the apparent procedural chaos, over 145 applications from Day Aggregates had been successfully processed, hinting at sporadic rather than systematic failings.
The Direct Vision Standard, effective from late October, dictates trucks over 12 tonnes with below three-star DVS ratings adhere to augmented safety device requirements, including visual aids for vulnerable road users and auditory warnings for oncoming turns. Day Aggregates, a company heavily invested in compliance, expressed exasperation over the arbitrary nature of the application decisions, despite significant financial investments to meet required standards.
While Transport for London admitted that issues had arisen, a spokesperson for Logistics UK reassured that such cases were rare. The ripple effect was acknowledged by DAF UK, who attributed TfL’s apparent inconsistencies to inexperienced staff handling an anticipated surge of permit requests. TfL, in its defence, pledged to refine the application system and ensure that operators receive due permits efficiently.
The unfolding predicament underscores a pressing need for TfL to streamline its permit application process to restore operator confidence.
