The building inspection industry is currently facing a significant shortfall in qualified inspectors, unable to meet the growing demands for comprehensive building checks.
- The Building Safety Regulator’s deadline for inspectors to demonstrate their competency was postponed, yet many remain uncertified.
- Modifications in rules allow class two and three inspectors, awaiting certification, to continue operations temporarily unsupervised.
- Increased workload looms as authorities fear reverting to supervised class one status will disrupt processes.
- Support for regulatory extensions is echoed by key figures in the sector amidst the ongoing challenges.
The building inspection sector is navigating a challenging period as it grapples with a shortage of qualified professionals essential for meeting the heightened demand for building safety evaluations. The Building Safety Regulator’s (BSR’s) initial deadline, set to ensure inspector competency, was extended by three months due to substantial concerns from the Local Authority Building Control (LABC). These concerns stemmed from an impending inability among several authorities to fulfil their building control obligations effectively.
In response to the certification shortfall, the BSR has had to temporarily amend competency rules for class two and three inspectors, who are authorised to conduct unsupervised safety assessments. Inspectors were required to apply for certification by 6 July but, given the delay in examination results, those in limbo can continue inspecting unsupervised. This move aims to temporarily bridge the gap until the required certifications are processed.
A letter from the BSR, dated 3 July, highlighted an unresolved issue where even by the end of the extended period, the supply of class two and three registered building inspectors (RBIs) might remain insufficient. Consequently, organisations might face challenges when inspectors, who have not completed their assessments, are downgraded to class one, necessitating supervisory oversight. The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities endorsed the decision to allow this limited group to carry on their duties unsupervised.
Class three inspectors retain the unique authority to inspect any high-risk and towering structures, while class two inspectors are restricted to non-high-risk buildings below 18 metres in height. Class one inspectors, lacking completed competency assessments, require supervision to perform their tasks. The maintainance of inspections by class three and two inspectors is crucial amidst elevated project demands.
The spokesperson for the Health and Safety Executive affirmed the decision to uphold the capabilities of this select cohort for restricted activities following their assessment process. This adjustment is also in bold defiance of operational disruptions that could arise from the inspector shortage. The BSR has proactively communicated with all involved, ensuring those left unreached revert to supervised roles.
LABC chief executive, Lorna Stimpson, expressed commendation for the regulatory body’s pragmatic approach in extending capabilities, which aligns with broader efforts to maintain industry standards during this transitional phase.
The industry continues to navigate its challenges as it upholds safety standards amid regulatory adaptations.
