The Branksome East viaduct in Bournemouth, a Victorian-era structure, might face demolition as part of local infrastructure plans.
- Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council lists the viaduct’s demolition in its draft plan for 2024-2039, stirring local concern.
- The viaduct, built in 1888, has been out of rail use since 1965, but remains a valuable heritage site.
- Community groups and campaigners are advocating for the viaduct’s preservation and potential repurposing.
- Council representatives state no immediate demolition decisions have been made, suggesting potential future preservation.
The Branksome East viaduct, an iconic piece of Victorian engineering, has been earmarked for possible demolition by the Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council. The structure, which features ten brick arches, was constructed in 1888 by the London & South West Railway to connect Bournemouth East and Bournemouth West stations. Although its rail service ceased in 1965, the viaduct remains a significant historical asset.
In the council’s draft infrastructure delivery plan for 2024-2039, a budget of £2 million has been allocated for the potential demolition of the viaduct, scheduled for 2035. This announcement has caused concern among local community groups and heritage campaigners who value the structure for its historical significance and potential for repurposing.
Despite the listing in the draft plan, the council has clarified that no definitive decision has been made regarding the viaduct’s fate. They have not excluded the possibility of its demolition but stress that it will not occur imminently. This has left room for further dialogue about its future, including its possible restoration as part of a nature and heritage park.
Engineers and heritage campaigners, represented by the HRE Group, are actively advocating for the viaduct’s preservation. Grame Bickerdike of the HRE Group expressed disappointment over the threat to such a valuable piece of railway history, highlighting the viaduct’s impressive construction details and its continuing value to the community. His call for thorough evaluations and condition reports underscores the need for informed decision-making.
Local efforts to preserve the viaduct include a listing application and alternative plans aimed at integrating the structure into a community-focused park. This initiative reflects a broader trend of recognising historical structures not just as relics of the past, but as potential assets for cultural and community enrichment.
The viaduct has suffered damage from vehicles on several occasions, leading to costly repairs borne by the council. Andy Hadley, responsible for climate response, environment and energy, acknowledged these concerns but noted the unlikelihood of a business case for demolition in the near term. His comments suggest a focus on balancing historical preservation with fiscal responsibility.
As discussions continue, the future of the Branksome East viaduct remains uncertain. However, the community’s active involvement and the council’s openness to alternatives point towards a collaborative path forward.
The fate of the Branksome East viaduct lies in the balance between preservation and pragmatic urban planning.
